Okay, so we all know excess weight isn’t exactly great for dogs.

But this study asked a more interesting question:

What is actually happening inside a dog as body condition changes?

If you’re new here, hi. 👋 I’m Haley, and I spend an unreasonable amount of time reading dog nutrition and health research so you do not have to.

My goal is basically:

help you make smarter choices for your dog without turning every study into a panic attack.

So this one caught my attention because it is not really about “fat dogs bad.”

It is about whether body condition and muscle loss may tell us something deeper about what is happening metabolically.

Researchers looked at 186 pet dogs and compared their body condition with 119 different metabolic markers.

And yep.

Things changed.

As body condition increased, researchers saw differences in:

• triglycerides
• fatty acids
• VLDL particles
• inflammation markers
• energy-related metabolites

Which is science-speak for:

The number on the scale may not be the whole story.

But here’s the part I really liked.

They also looked at muscle loss in older dogs.

And significant muscle loss was often seen alongside underlying disease.

Not always.

And this study absolutely does not mean:

“Your senior dog lost muscle, therefore something terrible is happening.”

Please do not let Petstagram turn it into that by tomorrow. 😂

But it does make me think we should pay attention to more than just:

“Yep, she weighs about the same as last year.”

Because a dog can maintain the same weight while losing muscle and gaining fat.

Same scale number.

Very different dog.

The giant asterisk

This was an observational study.

Researchers did not make dogs gain weight or put them on a weight-loss program.

So we can say higher body condition was associated with metabolic differences.

We cannot say it directly caused every one of them.

Also worth knowing:

The study was funded by PetMeta Labs, a canine metabolomics testing company.

One author worked for the company, and another was a board director and shareholder.

Does that automatically make the research bad?

Nope.

Does it belong in the “things I want to know before I blindly repost a headline” category?

Absolutely.

My takeaway?

I care a little less about the exact number on Kiara’s scale…

…and a lot more about:

Can I feel her ribs?

Does she have a waist?

Is she maintaining muscle?

Is her body composition changing even if her weight isn’t?

Because apparently our dogs are once again asking us to be slightly more nuanced than:

skinny = healthy / chunky = unhealthy

Rude of them, honestly.

I broke down the full study, including what the researchers actually did, what they found, and the giant caveats on my blog:

Your Dog's Weight May Be More Than Their Waistline ​ Read Here

Thank you again for being part of our pack. I look forward to sharing more about pet nutrition and learning together! Talk Soon, Haley + Kiara 🐾

P.S. One thing I am absolutely stealing from this study for senior dogs: watching muscle condition, not just weight. That's way more useful than obsessing over a single number.

600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
​Unsubscribe · Preferences​